October 2019 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 20:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Dear administrators:

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Siihb (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

the block was not necessary to prevent damage or disruption - I have not edited a single page but my own user page. The only users going to this page are the ones involved in the OG dispute. Siihb (talk) 20:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or the block is no longer necessary because you 1.understand what you have been blocked for, 2.will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and 3.will make useful contributions instead.


Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

Tiderolls 21:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 15:07, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Dear administrators:

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Siihb (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please explain how a temporary block became a permanent block? Please also explain the attempt to say I have not contributed when it is clear I have on numerous other articles. Thanks and have a great day. Siihb (talk) 18:50, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. I suspect the block became indefinite(not 'permanent') when the blocking admin read your user page. I would have done the same thing. 331dot (talk) 18:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.