Siek94
January 2024
editThank you for providing a lengthy edit reason. I could have added a template here, but since you appear to be going full-throttle, let's talk.
First, your tone is too close to lawyer-speak, I don't know if you're a homophobic stan who is trying to sound all big and impressive, or if you have a conflict of interest and are trying to legitimately act like a lawyer, but the former is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia and the latter is outright not allowed.
Also discouraged are things like saying Please refrain from reissuing this material.
– you cannot act like an arbiter of content and try to tell people that they shouldn't include sourced information. Further, you say that including the material Flagrantly contravenes Wikipedia rules.
despite the fact that it really doesn't; you clearly do not know "Wikipedia rules" and are invoking this to sound like an authority figure instead of an angry WP:SPA.
As for the rest of your strongly-worded disagreement, Mundo Deportivo, El Nacional, and L-Mag are none of fan-created content [...] gossip, fanfiction, and assumptions, devoid of fact
as you assert. If you believe these sources are all so entirely illegitimate, why are you only removing them from one section of one article? You are simply making things up so you can sound like you have a good reason to remove sourced content.
The combination of your statements that I have quoted sounds like you are trying to bully people into not including legitimate content that you simply disagree with being on Wikipedia. If this is not the case, please explain yourself and your tirade. You can email me from my userpage if necessary. Kingsif (talk) 23:20, 5 January 2024 (UTC)