Siddharth171287

February 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Debate. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. In addition, your article is currently being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Budget debate. You may voice your concerns there. OlEnglish (talk) 19:23, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Budget debate. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chicken Wing (talk) 19:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Belief

"Bcoz u didnt believe me about budget debate to be existing" (e-mail) When did I say that? Please take the trouble to actually read my comments. I never doubted that your proposal existed. But I do totally question whether it is notable enough for Wikipedia. (Also why clog up my e-mail with half a megabyte of PDF when you could just send me a link?) — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 00:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC)