Someone keeps persistently removing the reference to Secdev on the Ghostnet entry. issue download the report you will clearly see that it is a joint publication of the Citizen Lab, Munk Center for international studies, and the SecDev Group. apparently, the New York Times simplifies it was difficult to juggle two organizational names in one short 1200 word column. all other media attribute the report correctly. so should Wikipedia.

Are you paid to edit articles in Wikipedia?

edit

I have heard an allegation that there is someone who is paid to edit Rafal Rohozinski's wikipedia article, and your account is by far the main contributor to that article. If you are doing this, you have an unreported conflict of interest, which is a violation of Wikipedia policy. See WP:NOPAY. The article itself is certainly a fawning portrayal of the subject, so the allegation is credible. 213.104.156.188 (talk) 00:27, 19 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rafal Rohozinski for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rafal Rohozinski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafal Rohozinski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Devokewater (talk) 15:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply