Sgriffth

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TransCentralPA.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Anne Delong (talk) 19:38, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Dear Sgriffth: I left a comment on the page of the article, but perhaps you didn't see it. Your article is quite interesting and should be in the Wikipedia. However, it's not ready to be included yet because it is missing something important. All Wikipedia articles must have references to reliable sources. This is for two reasons. First, Wikipedia only includes articles about topics that are discussed in written sources such as books, magazines, news articles, etc. You have to show that this is true by "citing" some of these sources. If the organization isn't written about anywhere except its own web site, blog, etc., then it shouldn't be in an encyclopedia.

Secondly, there are facts in the article, and you have to show that these are true facts by citing sources as well. You can use the organization's web site only for very obvious things like the name, where it is, and things like that. For the rest you need independent verification.

If you are taking classes, you are probably aware of references, because instructors insist that essays have a bibliography or reference section. This is the same idea.

I hope this helps, and I hope that you add the references and submit the article again.

—Anne Delong (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately the draft was a copyright violation of the organization's website; almost all content was copied verbatim. I've thus tagged it for speedy deletion. Huon (talk) 20:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)