The article List of foreign football players in Liga I 2010–11 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete as original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz679 12:13, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Romania

edit
 
Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 04:48, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Brodina gas field

edit
 

The article Brodina gas field has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Run of the mill gas field with no notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 23:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Torcești gas field

edit
 

The article Torcești gas field has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The one reference it has is an old financial report that isn't available in more, it has one mention in a trade journal and wiki regurgitation hits, no book, no news. No significant coverage, no notability. Gas fields need to be unquestionably notable to have their own article. Not redirecting anywhere because the info is not referenced. no reliable sources can be found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 18:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sighișoara gas field

edit
 

The article Sighișoara gas field has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced, no significant reliable sources available, only provides out of data data that nobody would rely on wikipedia to provide. not mentioned in books, no news reports of anything happening in relation to it. non notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 21:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply