December 2007 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Brianga (talk) 06:47, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Serio. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Tonywalton Talk 09:46, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Serio, you will be blocked from editing. Pharmboy (talk) 17:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tonywalton Talk 17:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Serio1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Serio163.224.213.47

Decline reason:

No reason provided for unblock. — Yamla (talk) 20:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Serio1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

because I did not do anythig wrong all I did is report the facts about a very famous rapper Serio and people keep on taking it down please leave it up and alone this is a real artist and very well known I seriously doubt that the majority of your editors are up on Chicano Rap

Decline reason:

Clearly WP:VANITY. — Yamla (talk) 20:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock declination review - I agree. You were told often enough what the procedure is - 1) do not remove the AfD template. 2) Put your arguments in the appropriate "Articles for deletion" page. You chose to ignore these warnings and repeatedly, despite clear instructions to the contrary, remove the AfD tag. Other actions like placing a spurious "protected article" tag on Serio and attempting to list Serio River for deletion merely confirm that you did not intend to follow the procedures developed by the Wikipedia community. Note that this has nothing to do with the Serio article itself; the reason for deletion of the article are to be found here, where you have made no contribution in arguing that the article should be retained. Tonywalton Talk 22:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Serio.JPG listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Serio.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 01:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Reply