Why?

edit

Did you do this? --John (talk) 18:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Never mind, I have fixed it. Please see WP:OVERLINK and WP:ICONDECORATION for future reference. --John (talk) 15:00, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Random House Corporate Logo 2011.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Random House Corporate Logo 2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:20, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Schlafwurst. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Two other things: if you remove sentences that are cited to a reliable sources, you should explain why in your edit summary or on the talk page. I have restored some content that you removed without explanation. Second, if you modify a sentence that is cited to a source, you must verify that the new content in the sentence is actually supported by the existing source. If this is not the case, you must find a new citation for that material. For instance, you wrote that "72 percent of Yelp searches are done from a mobile device", but this is not what the WSJ article supporting the sentence says. If you do have a conflict of interest with Yelp or any other Wikipedia topics you are editing, please disclose it immediately. Thank you. Altamel (talk) 21:57, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply