Deal or No Deal Canada edit

Can you take more screens of it?--WestJet 22:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC) {Replied --Scani 04:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)}Reply

Models, the differance in the USA case and Canadian case, the phone. --WestJet 21:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar! edit

  The Original Barnstar
For your hard work on the Deal or No Deal (Canada) article, providing images from the show! WestJet 22:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Howie's Cowboy Hat... edit

By any chance do you have a screen of Howie in his cowboy hat? I want this picture! --WestJet 22:47, 2 March 2007 (UTC) {Replied --Scani 15:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)}Reply

Bypasses edit

I was looking at the transportation map from the city's most recent official plan, which has "proposed" ramps in both the southwest and northeast corners. I suppose the MTO might have different ideas than the city does, but that's what my source was. Bearcat 00:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

No problems. I found the map fascinating; some of the proposed roads are hilarious. (If they want a road from Laurentian to Lo-Ellen, why don't they just widen the bikepath that already goes from the athletic facilities to Loach's instead of building that silly thing? And what's with the Maley-Notre Dame interchange?) And thanks to you too...I didn't even know they had a web page up for the bypass project. Bearcat 03:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Furry edit

Looking for something to do? WikiProject Furry is improving articles on furry and anthropomorphic topics, and we'd like to have you on board.

Our current goal is to raise Anthrocon, furry convention and furry fandom to good article status and beyond - but if that doesn't take your fancy, there are plenty of other articles to work on. Give it a go and let us know how you're doing!

You received this one-time invitation because you are a Furry Wikipedian. GreenReaper 23:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Walden, etc. edit

It was a matter of stub reduction — it's honestly better to have six longer articles about the various communities in the city rather than 40 or 50 three-line stubs that didn't have any actual references and mostly couldn't ever be expanded much beyond their existing length. There was also a request on the main city article's talk page to expand the Walden/Valley East/Rayside-Balfour, etc., articles. Bearcat (talk) 21:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've already whittled down some of the old-city neighbourhoods where I could — Robinson + Lockerby + Lo-Ellen = South End (would McFarlane Lake go there too, or is it generally considered a separate thing?), Barrydowne, Lebel and Nickeldale into New Sudbury, etc. But there were also some where I wasn't sure of the best way to proceed — there aren't any immediately obvious merge targets for things like Donovan or Gatchell or Copper Cliff. Bearcat (talk) 22:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
I should mention that in this particular circumstance, I don't think merging them all into one stub article at the title "Sudbury, Ontario" would be the best solution, because a lot of people still don't understand how the government structure has changed, and would just blindly link to the old title as if it were the article on the current city. An alternative title would be suitable (maybe repurpose the existing List of communities in Greater Sudbury?), but for now I still think the Sudbury, Ontario title should be left as a redirect. Bearcat (talk) 22:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Heh, almost finished doing exactly that — especially since merging all the community articles up to the old municipalities basically made the list redundant anyway. However, I've opted to move the list to the new title Urban neighbourhoods of Sudbury since that's a more accurate reflection of what it now contains, and also gets it as close to the naming format of the other articles as possible without actually tripping over the redirect issue. I'm in the process of fixing the redirects now. Bearcat (talk) 00:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
The only question left now is Wanup, since it was a new annexation that wasn't part of any incorporated municipality prior to 2001. At the same time, though, it looks kind of odd for Wanup to be the only community-level part of the city that has its own article instead of being merged into one of the omnibus articles. What do you think — should we leave it as a standalone article, or should we cheat and merge it into one of the municipal lists anyway? Bearcat (talk) 00:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:DonD Canada Set.JPG edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:DonD Canada Set.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:29, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello Scani! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 944 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Mélanie Turgeon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:07, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:DonD Canada Models.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:DonD Canada Models.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:07, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:DonD Canada Reveal.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:DonD Canada Reveal.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:08, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:DonD Canada Banker.JPG) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:DonD Canada Banker.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:08, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

RfC: New helper policy edit

Hello member of Category:Wikipedians who use IRC! You are invited to join an ongoing discussion on Wikipedia talk:IRC/wikipedia-en-help aimed at defining a policy for prerequisites to being a helper in the "#wikipedia-en-help connect" channel in a section titled "New helper policy".

To prevent future mailings about IRC, you may remove your user page from Category:Wikipedians who use IRC.
Assistance is available upon request if you can't figure out where it is being added to your user page.
This message has been sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc)
Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply