May 2020 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Crucifixion of Jesus. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:31, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

My edits were an attempt to get the article to read in a more balanced manner instead of the heavily religious bias it currently carries Sawjared (talk) 09:32, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state. If others are disputing your edits, you need to discuss the concern on the article talk page. Note that Wikipedia does not claim to be free of bias; any bias in sources will be reflected in Wikipedia. Wikipedia presents the sources of information so readers can evaluate them and judge them for themselves as to their accuracy or level of bias. 331dot (talk) 09:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Except the sources are not independent reliable sources, they are all theological authors with the aim of furthering their cause. There is zero balance to the article. I have raised the issue with the editor. Sawjared (talk) 09:41, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Then you should allow that discussion to take place. If you are unable to reach a consensus, then you can move to dispute resolution. 331dot (talk) 09:42, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sawjared, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Sawjared! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)