Sawerkar
The article you created looks like it is a very close copy of the journal article in BMC Evolutionary Biology, and as such the article could be deleted without warning per the speedy deletion criterion G12 (copyright infringement). Can you rewrite the article without using the same wording as in the paper? - Neparis (talk) 02:21, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Copyright problems
editHello. Concerning your contribution, Haplogroup Q5 or Q7 (Y-DNA), we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, Haplogroup Q5 or Q7 (Y-DNA) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Haplogroup Q5 or Q7 (Y-DNA) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Haplogroup Q5 or Q7 (Y-DNA) and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Haplogroup Q5 or Q7 (Y-DNA) with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Haplogroup Q5 or Q7 (Y-DNA).
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. - Neparis (talk) 03:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sawerkar
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Sawerkar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The file File:Sawerkar.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused personal photo. Out of scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
