San2011

Nomination of Auctigo for deletion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Auctigo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auctigo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Reichsfürst (talk) 18:17, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Auctigo edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Auctigo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ukexpat (talk) 15:23, 17 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

June 2011 edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for For socking per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/San2011.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- DQ (t) (e) 14:25, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Auctigo edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Auctigo has been deleted three times, and resubmitted content has as of yet shown little difference from the original. Therefore I have protected the article from recreation. If you are able to create an article that satisfies the notability and reliability requirements of Wikipedia, you can build it in your userspace at a page such as User:San2011/Auctigo or use the Article wizard so that others may be able to review the submission. But just pasting the same content again with little or no change will not improve your chances and may lead to the article title being protected indefinitely. —Soap— 23:55, 2 July 2011 (UTC)Reply