Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! GABgab 21:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

This line makes the implication that abortion is justifiable due to the fact most cases are rape "and widespread sexual violence results in many women getting pregnant against their will"

You need to prove that there is an epidemic of pregnant women due to rape in Latin America. This is unlikely to be true. It is very likely to be a very very very small amount of pregnancies are due to rape. It is 1/2000 in the US.

Whether or not you believe in abortion or not you can't dismiss it as being a purely Roman Catholic idea without exploring their thought process "ccess to contraceptives is limited in the predominantly Roman Catholic region,[146] and widespread sexual violence results in many women getting pregnant against their will"

Why not just say a majority of Latin Americans think abortion is unethical. The implication is religious people are stupid. So the quote should say: the Roman catholic church is unsure when life begins therefore many of the region take the stance to not allow abortion after conception. The quote is more clear and it doesn't demean people for having a certain view different from yours. The content here assumes abortion is always justifiable. That is a controversial opinion and not a FACT.

Samuelboyle96, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Samuelboyle96! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Policy regarding living persons

edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Suzanna Danuta Walters. In this case there is consensus that the material you continue to restore does not meet Wikipedia's policy regarding living persons or WP:NPOV. Please join the discussion on the article talk page and gain consensus for inclusion of the material instead of restoring it wholesale.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:53, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

It was referenced. It quoted what she said.

Sorry you have a political agenda. Please read the following: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaron_Lanier#Wikipedia_and_the_omniscience_of_collective_wisdomPlease read the following.

  If you restore the disputed BLP-violating content again you will be blocked from editing.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:34, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Of course you would do that.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaron_Lanier#Wikipedia_and_the_omniscience_of_collective_wisdom

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring to restore disputed content to a WP:BLP without consensus for inclusion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:41, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply