Hello, Saintpako, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We require detailed information about the source and licensing status of all images uploaded to Wikipedia. Some of the images you have recently uploaded do not contain this information and will be deleted in a few days unless that information is provided. I am posting the notices below to your talk page in accordance with established procedure, to notify you of this situation. Please let me know if you have questions or need any help. —Bkell (talk) 04:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry; I didn't notice that you had given sources for your images in the article Headset (Headphone & Microphone). I have deleted the images Image:Phones.jpg, Image:TB710 1.jpg, Image:H101.jpg, Image:C100 1.jpg, and Image:M22.gif, since they seem to have been taken directly from copyrighted websites without permission of the copyright holder. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. We cannot accept copyrighted images unless they have been released by the copyright holder under a free license or they meet the strict criteria of the Wikipedia non-free content policy. Please let me know if you have any questions. —Bkell (talk) 05:05, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:I543337.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:I543337.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Accutone

edit

The whole article is written like an ad. It isn't written in an encyclopedic manner. In fact, from my first look at it, I figured that the article was probably copied from the Accutone website, it's so ad-speak like. Look around at a few more articles for products and see how they're written. Corvus cornixtalk 03:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

In addition, you need to provide neutral third party reliable sources which discuss Accutone as the main focus of the article. Corvus cornixtalk 03:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Good, thanks, welcome to Wikipedia and happy editing. Corvus cornixtalk 03:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


edit
 

Hello. Concerning your upload of the image File:Rundblad.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted images obtained from other sources, without the permission of the author(s). This image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.skellefteaaik.se/plugins/spelartruppen/images/7_big.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Rundblad.jpg falls under the speedy deletion criteria and has been deleted.

If you believe that the image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under a free license then you should do one of the following:
  • If you have permission from the author, leave me a message explaining the details and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the <pick a free licence> or released into the public domain leave me a message at my talk page with a link to where I can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Rundblad.jpg]].
  • Or alternately drop me a note about this file if I have misunderstood something.
    - Peripitus (Talk) 11:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply