Unreferenced BLPs

edit

  Hello Sadina Alla! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 9 of the articles that you created are currently tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 875 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Sadina Alla - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Venera Mustafa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Gentiana Ramadani - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Ilda Reka - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Anisa Kospiri - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Denisa Kola - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Hygerta Sako - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Monika Zguro - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Sidorela Kola - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:22, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Monika Zguro

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Monika Zguro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Graham Colm (talk) 22:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ilda Reka for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ilda Reka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilda Reka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Whpq (talk) 19:43, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Miss Shqipëria for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Shqipëria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Shqipëria until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flat Out (talk) 05:43, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Valbona Selimllari for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valbona Selimllari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valbona Selimllari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 05:30, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sidorela Kola for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sidorela Kola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidorela Kola until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 05:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Venera Mustafa for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Venera Mustafa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venera Mustafa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Gentiana Ramadani for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gentiana Ramadani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gentiana Ramadani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Denisa Kola for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Denisa Kola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denisa Kola until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 05:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply