User talk:SRampersaud/Leadership

Latest comment: 11 years ago by A Bhagwandin

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student Wikipedia User: M.Caban
Date of review 4/25/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: SRampersaud
URL of editor’s Userpage Sandbox pre-edit URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SRampersaud/Leadership
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 4/25/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 4/25/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length
Image (needed/appropriate) If can be found, an image relating to edit will be beneficial
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) The information provided was accurate from the text book
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) The article information was relevant to I/O Psych and was accurate from the textbook.
Wikiformatting Bullets were appropriate
Grammar & composition You may want to split the first sentence. If you want you can put a period after "early". Start the new sentence with they. Example: They typically fail...

Otherwise it's good

Other comments If it can be found, adding a external link would be beneficial.



Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Aaleksanian
Date of review 4/26/2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User:SRampersaud
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SRampersaud/Leadership&action=edit
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 04/26/13
Date review submitted to instructor 04/26/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Perfect length
Image (needed/appropriate) Might want to add an image:)
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Very accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Yes
Wikiformatting Nice formatting!
Grammar & composition none
Other comments You might want to start it differently to kind of outline what your topic will be about.



Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:MsNika349
Date of review 4/27/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User:SRampersaud
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SRampersaud/Leadership&action=edit
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 04/27/13
Date review submitted to instructor 04/27/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length
Image (needed/appropriate) Optional to add one. Not necessary in my opinion.
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Good format
Grammar & composition Good grammar/composition One Mistake on the first word, should be Managers*
Other comments good edit material.


Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student Wikipedia User: CRamel16
Date of review 5/2/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: SRampersaud
URL of editor’s Userpage Sandbox pre-edit URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SRampersaud/Leadership
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/2/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 5/2/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length
Image (needed/appropriate) good job all around, image not necessary
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) The information provided was accurate.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) The article information was relevant to I/O Psych and was accurate.
Wikiformatting Bullets were appropriate
Grammar & composition good
Other comments add a external link. good work


Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student Wikipedia User: Neffateriet
Date of review 5/5/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: SRampersaud
URL of editor’s Userpage Sandbox pre-edit URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SRampersaud/Leadership
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/5/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 5/5/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length
Image (needed/appropriate) great job all around, image not necessary
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) The information provided was accurate.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) The textbook information was accurate.
Wikiformatting creative
Grammar & composition No grammar issues
Other comments Great job


Name of student reviewer: Alyssa Bhagwandin

Date of review: 5/15/2013

Name of editor Wikipedia User: Wikipedia User: SRampersaud

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SRampersaud/Leadership&action=edit

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/15/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 05/15/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): good length

Image (needed/appropriate): N/A

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): information from the text was accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes it is adherent to I/O Psychology

Wikiformatting: bulletin points were a good idea

Grammar & composition: grammar and composition was okay one or two mistakes.

Other comments: great job overall!

User:A_Bhagwandin (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:33, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply