SLSQK

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, SLSQK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least some of your recent edits, such as the ones you made to Integrative medicine, appeared to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Brangifer (talk) 20:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Integrative medicine. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
3. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Please read about the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD). When your content has been reverted, YOU must initiate or participate in discussion about the matter on the talk page, and you must not restore the content until a consensus decision about its fate has been reached with other editors. -- Brangifer (talk) 22:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SLSQK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I should not be blocked, it is legal to have more than one account and the edits by that I reverted were negative and not true.Also I was not suitably warned prior to the block. This is a blatant attack by Jadon, BullRangifer and PPdd who dont agree with the subject and have done everything in their power to discredit the article SLSQK (talk) 8:54 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Actually, it is not legal to have more than one account - please read this page. Also, warnings are not a perquisite to a block. I would suggest reading our guide to requesting unblocking and trying again. TNXMan 14:52, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SLSQK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I apologize and am not trying to be rude. I am new to Wikipedia, and created the article under the Bravewell user name. I then recieved the following message stating that I could not use that name so I changed it to SLSQK, I have not made the same edits or contributions under both names and I feel like I am being thrown under the bus by people who do not want this article to exist. Please let me know what the correct course of action should be.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen (Bravewell) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this:

1.It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization. 2.Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes. Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations.The article in question is Integrative medicine#Bravewell Collaborative. Thank you. - 2/0 (cont.) 23:05, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I can see no evidence on the Bravewell userpage of an attempt to change your name there. We are not going to unblock this account while the other is active. so, which one do you want?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.