S.a.mac2012

Welcome!

Hello, S.a.mac2012, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Call the office, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 05:04, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Call the office

The article Call the office has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable rock club lacking ghits and gnews.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 05:04, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Call the office for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Call the office is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call the office until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 23:35, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

February 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Cave of the Crystals, Deep sea creature and Cryptozoology, you may be blocked from editing. LuckyLouie (talk) 19:25, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Evidence for journal article needed

And I'd like proof that Exploring the Possibility of Mythical Creatures in the Real World is a real article. You need to produce the evidence to show that you aren't vandalising. Dougweller (talk) 19:32, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

‪Cave of the Crystals‬

In this edit to ‪Cave of the Crystals‬, the following citation was introduced:

"Fregola, Rosa Anna and Eugenio Scandy. "Spectacular Subterranean Spectacle: Giant Cryatal Cave". Physics and Chemistry of Minerals (October 2007), 34 (8), pg. 529-541"

However the actual article in Physics and Chemistry of Minerals (October 2007), 34 (8), pg. 529-541 is:

"Cross-twinning in a natural spinel from Sri Lanka" by Rosa Anna Fregola and Eugenio Scandale" [1].

User is obviously adding deliberately false information. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

‪Deep sea creature‬

In this edit to ‪Deep sea creature‬, the following citation was added:

"Fox, C. W. and M. E. Czesak. "Living without light: How inerspace exploration can help understand extraterrestrial life". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. (September 2004), 17 (5), pg. 1007-1017"

However, the actual article in Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Volume 17, Issue 5, pages 1007–1017, September 2004 is:

"Complex genetic architecture of population differences in adult lifespan of a beetle: nonadditive inheritance, gender differences, body size and a large maternal effect. C. W. Fox1, M. E. Czesak2, W. G. Wallin1 [2]

More deliberately false information. - LuckyLouie (talk) 21:40, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Cryptozoology

In this edit to ‪Cryptozoology‬, the following citation was added:

Ferreira, Catarina and Paulo Alves. "Exploring the Possibliity of Mythical Creatures in the Real World". European Journal of Wildlife Research (October 2009), 55 (5), pg. 487-496

However on Pages: 487-496 of the European Journal of Wildlife Research (2009) Volume: 55, Issue: 5 is:

"Influence of habitat management on the abundance and diet of wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus algirus) populations in Mediterranean ecosystems by Catarina Ferreira, Paulo Célio Alves" [3]

After being reverted, this false information was added to the article a second time. - LuckyLouie (talk) 21:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello S.a.mac2012. You're being discussed at User talk:Dougweller#Fake cites. Unless you can provide a good explanation it is likely you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Dougweller (talk) 21:03, 14 February 2013 (UTC)