Robinuthapa

I never looked at it as my launch pad. I just did it for fun and experience. My expectations were not high so my disappointments were also not low. Robinuthapa (talk) 16:25, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

I noticed that you recently made edits while logged out. There are two reasons why you should not edit while logged out: 1) doing so will reveal your IP address; and 2) people may accuse you of sockpuppetry, i.e. trying to make yourself look like multiple users in order to gain the upper hand in a dispute. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:44, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Jammu & Kashmir. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Read also WP:BRD. Regards, kashmiri ^TALK 02:18, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Lahnda

Reverted your changes for several reasons: you moved the article to a non-existent name, changed the lead into a dictionary definition, misused terms like "ethology", etc. Some of your changes might have been improvements, but I didn't review them all. — kwami (talk) 02:53, 20 June 2013 (UTC)