License tagging for Image:Ms mf cd.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Ms mf cd.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Mcubelogo.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Mcubelogo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

postcard_front.jpg: unintentional confusion re jpg filename

edit

hi--

i had uploaded a photo in April using the filename postcard_front.jpg, w/ summary "Ringling Estates Inc. vintage promotional postcard". perhaps you overwrote this filename because your image was showing up on the page for my topic? tyring to fix the page so it would show the correct image it somehow resized your image to the aspect ratio of my image. i uploaded the jpeg i needed to a new more descriptive filename. but i don't know how to undo what happened to yours. sorry.

--dht 01:55, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:Do you believe.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Do you believe.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ms mf cd.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Ms mf cd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Do You Believe? Another World is Possible

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Do You Believe? Another World is Possible, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Do You Believe? Another World is Possible. Thank you. Schuym1 (talk) 07:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Another World Is Possible

edit
 

The article Another World Is Possible has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The disamb page does not disamb to any existing WP articles.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Novaseminary (talk) 17:17, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Another World Is Possible

edit

I have nominated Another World Is Possible, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Another World Is Possible. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Novaseminary (talk) 01:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Water Music Records for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Water Music Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water Music Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 07:05, 25 June 2019 (UTC)Reply