Risingsun121

Welcome!

A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Risingsun121, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
• Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 21:07, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kirati people, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I had made some change in article because the information written about Kirat people are not accurate. The information was false and written by someone who does not have the knowledge of Kirat. I am not going to re-add it . You have to undone my writing to Kirat people page. I have already made a link to it when I edit the Kirat people page . You check my previous addition to Kirat people. There is lot of Kirat people website that supports my edit of this page.

user talk: risingsun121 2nd January 2018

Kirat people hardly ever protect their culture. Ancient kirat culture was nearly destroyed or used by late invaders . They don't have much evidence to support source unless it is listed by foreigners through ancient books. Risingsun121 (talk) 14:25, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

You never, in your changes, added any new sources. Now you might have some local knowledge but perhaps this is the downside of Wikipedia: it's institutionally wrong. In some way or other this is a good thing, because the requirement to cite sources for our work means that other people can verify what is written in the encyclopedia. They can't just pass it off as truth. Sometimes, sources are called out as wrong, lazy journalism or whatnot. In this case, if we can find a correct source, all is good. If this is what has been repeatedly said, we can't prove that the source(s) is/are wrong. We lose ability to verify it, but uncited info is as bad as wrong info.

Principles aside, there are a few other issues with your work -- you changed content but kept the same source, so you misrepresented what the source said. Please, don't do that. Bottom line, find some reliable sources that say what you say (you can find suggestion about what this implies at WP:IRS), and then you can re-add the content. Thanks, !dave 15:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

You accused me of not providing a source.

"There are four different groups of Kirati tribes, including Himalayan Kiratis, Tibetan-Himalayan, Khas-Kiratis and the Kacharis of South Asian region. Their populations are such largest comparing to any other ethnic groups of South Asia."

"Paleo-Newar population, Sherpa, Bodo-Kirati or Kachari "

These are listed as Kirati people or tribes without any supporting sources too. But you keep it. You asked me for a reliable source but can't see some information of kirat people or tribes listed without any sources. Risingsun121 (talk) 16:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

If they are unsourced, you may remove them. In this I don't see any <ref> after what you wrote. !dave 16:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

It appears that questions have been answered. If I'm wanted here, please wp:ping me. Jim1138 (talk) 21:06, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

am giving reply to both you and !dave in same comment. Both you both guys did nothing to Kirat people page about false identification. You Jim, remove all my writings and put back all old information which does not support sources on Kirat people page. You are ignoring my request as I have previously said. You both had put a blame on me for a source but failed to check on Kirat people. Risingsun121 (talk) 05:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

!Dave, most information on Kirat pages have no sources but you have done nothing to erase it. I did the same but I have no problem no write the sources. Risingsun121 (talk) 05:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Jim1138, your edit on Kirat pages does not support sources ethier. You check your writings before you check others. Risingsun121 (talk) 05:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Now a wp:Wikilawyer? I did request that you wp:ping me. Both here and at the top of my talk page. If you are uninterested in my requests, why should I be interested in yours? Jim1138 (talk) 05:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murder of Dil Bahadur Limbu (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Murder of Dil Bahadur Limbu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Murder of Dil Bahadur Limbu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe decker^talk 04:45, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Limbuwan Gorkha War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ilam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mount Everest, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. —hike395 (talk) 21:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Citation

Greetings,

Kindly add relible sources to validate your edits according to Wikipedia guidelines. Please use legible sentences.

KInd Regards,

--Tabletop123 (talk) 17:17, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Death of Dil Bahadur Limbu has been accepted

Death of Dil Bahadur Limbu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:05, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Risingsun121. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)