Renbretts
December 2016
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Metroid II: Return of Samus has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Metroid II: Return of Samus was changed by Renbretts (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853739 on 2016-12-13T23:05:27+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Please use the article talk page to discuss your concerns with the content at Metroid II: Return of Samus. Repeatedly blanking sourced content is disruptive and may lead to a block of your account. If you find yourself in a content dispute, follow the advice here.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- The game is illegal to download. All download links were halted. Renbretts (talk) 23:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- That's not relevant here. Again, if you have an issue with the article content then the place to discuss it is here. Edit warring to blank the content will only lead to a block of your account.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- If something's illegal and you have a wiki page praising a game that's illegal to download, how is that absolutely not a problem? Nintendo doesn't want users download the game. it's their intellectual property. Having users praise aand illegal game should not be tolerated.Renbretts (talk) 23:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- Because Wikipedia isn't censored. Again, if you have concerns regarding an article's content you need to discuss those concerns on the article's associated talk page. Please read through the links provided to you here and then start a discussion to see if there is consensus for the changes you wish to make.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- If something's illegal to download, people shouldn't be encouraged. There are always out of bound lines in regards to these things. Renbretts (talk) 23:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- Because Wikipedia isn't censored. Again, if you have concerns regarding an article's content you need to discuss those concerns on the article's associated talk page. Please read through the links provided to you here and then start a discussion to see if there is consensus for the changes you wish to make.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- If something's illegal and you have a wiki page praising a game that's illegal to download, how is that absolutely not a problem? Nintendo doesn't want users download the game. it's their intellectual property. Having users praise aand illegal game should not be tolerated.Renbretts (talk) 23:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Metroid II: Return of Samus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Don't keep removing this. Meters (talk) 23:37, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- I won't edit anymore, but I made my case on this talk page. Renbretts (talk) 23:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- You were reverted 4 times, by a bot and two different editors, and I was in the process of reverting you when I edit conflicted with another editor. As has been explained, your concerns seems to be unfounded. If you want to discuss it take it to the article's talk page where other interested editors will see it, but I doubt very mcuh that you will have any luck. Meters (talk) 23:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- THanks for replying. I won't be reverting anymore. Renbretts (talk) 06:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- You were reverted 4 times, by a bot and two different editors, and I was in the process of reverting you when I edit conflicted with another editor. As has been explained, your concerns seems to be unfounded. If you want to discuss it take it to the article's talk page where other interested editors will see it, but I doubt very mcuh that you will have any luck. Meters (talk) 23:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Renbretts, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Renbretts! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 14 December 2016 (UTC) |