Reid.m.segal, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Reid.m.segal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Reid.m.segal, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:34, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


I like the idea of improving a woman psychologist's page. I looked through the whole list provided on blackboard. Here is a list of all the women that I am initially interested in researching and why. Karen A. Matthews has a single sentence, so there is a lot of area for expanding her page. Lauren Alloy has a good start and sounds like she has some exciting research that would be fun to look through while adding to her page. Bonnie Strickland was a president of the APA but has a very short page that doesn't really say much about her career at all. Phoebe C. Ellsworth has a start to her page, but there is no organization to it. Rochel Gelman has a short biography, but there isn't any information about her contributions to psychology. Jill Morawski, Cynthia D. Belar, Lynn A. Cooper, Jessica Henderson Daniel,Rachel T. Hare-Mustin , Lynne Hasher, and Jill N. Reich don't have pages started, so it would be a fresh start. Reid.m.segal (talk) 17:58, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Top two choices for Wikipedia Project

edit

My favorite choice of the ones I originally narrowed it down to is Lauren Alloy. Her research is very interesting to me, and I was able to find a lot of information on her that is not yet included on Wikipedia with a simple Google search. My second choice is Bonnie Strickland because it surprises me that a former president of the APA would have so little written about her career on Wikipedia. I could find information on her a little less easily than Lauren Alloy, but it was still definitely possible to find a good amount.

I Reid.m.segal (talk) 00:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

I think those are both very interesting people that we could find more information about to really expand upon! I like researching people more than specific topics so I think this will be nice. Looking at both their Wikipedia pages and the information that can be found we would be able to add a lot

((User: Megan.rodgers6)) February 6th 10:01 am

Feedback from Dr. Council: Lauren Alloy was taken by another group. However, Bonnie Strickland is a great choice. I've met her a couple of times and she is a wonderful person as well as an eminent psychologist. I can tell you some things about her that would be interesting to include in the article. J.R. Council (talk) 18:09, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

To do List

edit

Find articles on topic, create detailed outline, organize information we need and do not need Megan.rodgers6 (talk)Megan Rodgers

Bonnie Strickland:

Life: what her early years we like (school) American psychology Accomplishments Megan.rodgers6 (talk)Megan Rodgers

outline

edit

Outline of what Wikipedia page will look like Megan.rodgers6 (talk)Megan Rodgers

References

edit

References we will use for Wikipedia page Megan.rodgers6 (talk) Megan Rodgers —Preceding undated comment added 13:26, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Reply