Regnad kcin75

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:54, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nagging

The article Nagging has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary definition already adequately covered in wiktionary. Basically, just juvenile humour - see Talk page. Fails WP:NOT#DICTIONARY

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Nagging for deletion

The article Nagging is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagging until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. andy (talk) 17:02, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Painted snipe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. likewise your edit to Snipe andy (talk) 17:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Painted snipe, you may be blocked from editing. andy (talk) 17:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

• Just to make it clear: I've reverted your edits to Snipe and Painted snipe because (a) they introduced factual inaccuracies, (b) they were intended to provide links to Nagging which is at AfD and (c) you stated your intention at Talk:Nagging of making disruptive edits to these pages. I'm now going to make a third and final reversion and give you a final warning for vandalism. After that you'll be blocked from editing wikipedia. andy (talk) 17:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

response

snipe

snipe hunt

if you genuinely can't see the difference you may need help. quit vandalizing MY edits.

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. andy (talk) 17:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:33, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

arbitration please

as you're so determined

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Painted snipe, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 17:43, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Dear Andy

I can hand this to an arbitrator, or go find a "goofy" wiki site and save you the angina. I KNOW that stuff like sarcasm doesn't come through readily via the printed page. i also know that snipe should have explained that all, and that by "including" it in the painted snipe page I kinda, sorta protected it, ipso facto.

i've had great fun and don't wish to cause you more grief. If you wish, I shall create a nagging snipe page and be done with it. frankly, it's not a bad idear, if I do say so myself. Not knee-slapper funny, but ok,i suppose.

Apologies! I'm actually CRACKING UP over it all, which can be considered intellectual cruelty. I feel shame. 2 minutes in the box.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for addition of factual errors, vandalism, personal attacks and general disruption. Please stop or the next block will be permanent. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:12, 14 December 2010 (UTC)