December 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm General Ization. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to House has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. General Ization Talk 21:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chinese people. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chinese people was changed by Reginald desoto (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869592 on 2015-12-03T02:11:51+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:11, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

not vandalism. Reginald desoto (talk) 02:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Chinese people with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 02:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

You replaced Uyghurs with a racial slur. If you post more such ridiculous comments or questions concerning reversion of your vandalism or disruptive edits on my talk page, I will consider them vandalism as well. Donner60 (talk) 02:28, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

response 2 donner 60.

edit

chill.

reginald

Reginald desoto (talk) 02:29, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

  This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Volvo. Donner60 (talk) 02:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:25, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply