ReggieHillman

another editor has nominated James Leavey for deletion, as "self-promotional/spam." As reviewing administrator, I don't think it's all that spammy, and I removed the deletion tag; however, the article may not be sustainable without published 3rd party reviews of his work. I advise you to add this very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process. DGG ( talk ) 04:55, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of James Leavey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Leavey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Leavey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hunc (talk • contribs) 20:26, 28 January 2017 (UTC)