March 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Ifnord. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jerome Adams without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You have removed referenced material. Please discuss such changes on the article's talk page first. Ifnord (talk) 04:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

DS notice: AP edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

I do want to note in addition to that that in some of your recent edit summaries, you have described content as "vandalism" when it did not appear to be the case. Vandalism has a very specific definition on Wikipedia, and accusing editors of vandalism when their edits do not fall into this category is considered a personal attack and may lead to a loss of editing privileges if continued. signed, Rosguill talk 15:36, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply