Adding reference to Wikipedia articles

edit
 
Just follow the steps as shown, and fill in the details

Hello Ranjeet.singh! Please do not forget to add references from reliable sources for the content you add to Wikipedia. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Adding well-formatted references is easy.

  1. While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite". Click on it.
  2. Then click on "templates".
  3. Choose the most appropriate template and then fill all relevant details.

This will add a well-formatted reference, which will allow other people to see where you got your information from. You can read more about this at Help:Edit toolbar, or watch this video: File:RefTools.ogv. Thanks and regards —DBigXray 21:00, 3 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

DBigXray 21:00, 3 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

August 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to 1978 Sikh–Nirankari clashes, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 06:17, 3 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jim I’m new to editing and couldn’t explain my thoughts. I just wanted to reflect that attacks on Sikhs aren’t related to a particular event while Indian Army attacked Gurudwaras before also. Anyway you can revert the changes I made. we will repeat our history, we will take the crown back :) Ranjeet.singh (talk) 16:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit
 
A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Ranjeet.singh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 06:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Please be aware that wp:verifiability is paramount on Wikipedia. Any significant content needs to wp:cite a wp:reliable source See help:referencing for beginners Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

August 2018

edit

  Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Sri Ganganagar. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. DBigXray 21:00, 3 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2020

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1984 anti-Sikh riots. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 18:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi @C.Fred I guess it is too late as I do not edit or use wikipedia that much. I am agree with the reply and I should have used the methods suggested to resolve the dispute. but as I already said I do not use wikipedia frequently, and rarely I tried to edit the content here.
Well you called my edits disruptive, that is completely nonsense and let me explain you why, similar to me there are millions of people who do not use or know how to edit or post information on wikipedia and the entity which committed Genocide against us (the India state) has word class tools to spread misinformation and also they have huge population to get it justified by the bloody rule of majority votes. So don't you think allowing one entity to post such critical information is right for Wikipedia without consulting the Sikhs? and I should argue with Indian editors? and if we don't argue wikipedia is contributing to the denial of the Genocide (See Ten stages of genocide).
You might be right if I did not follow some guidelines but I guess these guidelines are as bloody as the Indian state?
I am not pointing at you or trying to abuse you, I just want to make this fact known.
May the Khalsa rule and bring every tyrant to the Justice
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕਾ ਖ਼ਾਲਸਾ ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫ਼ਤਿਹ Ranjeet.singh (talk) 09:55, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
It is not for Wikipedia to make the call in its own language on whether it's genocide. We are a tertiary source and go with what reliable sources call it. until those secondary sources say "genocide", we don't. —C.Fred (talk) 14:57, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply