Reference

edit

State the reference and do not remove content on Nizamabad, Telangana page.--Vin09 (talk) 09:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

June 2014

edit

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Nizamabad, Telangana. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  LeoFrank  Talk 12:29, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Abusive language

edit

Do not use abusive language in the edit summary or write insulting statements or warning others.--Vin09 (talk) 14:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nizamabad, Telangana. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 14:55, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

June 2014

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Nizamabad, Telangana, you may be blocked from editing.  LeoFrank  Talk 15:33, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

June 2014

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Nizamabad, Telangana shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN talk to me 18:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

June 2014

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. NeilN talk to me 18:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply