Raju198
Reference
editState the reference and do not remove content on Nizamabad, Telangana page.--Vin09 (talk) 09:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
editPlease do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Nizamabad, Telangana. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — LeoFrank Talk 12:29, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Abusive language
editDo not use abusive language in the edit summary or write insulting statements or warning others.--Vin09 (talk) 14:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nizamabad, Telangana. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 14:55, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
editPlease stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Nizamabad, Telangana, you may be blocked from editing. — LeoFrank Talk 15:33, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
editYour recent editing history at Nizamabad, Telangana shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN talk to me 18:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
editYou may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. NeilN talk to me 18:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Farhan112233 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 19:29, 17 June 2014 (UTC) |