Welcome

edit
Hello, Rajakarthipillai, and Welcome to Wikipedia!    

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Rajakarthipillai, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced additions/removal.

edit

You have in some articles such as Karaiyar, Velupillai Prabhakaran and List of Vellalars added unsourced content or removed sourced content. You should probably be familiar with these Wikipedia policies first: WP:CS, WP:RS, and also this essay WP:CRV. Xenani (talk) 20:31, 23 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit

September 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Dharmalion76. I noticed that you recently removed content from Vellalar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dharmalion76 (talk) 16:25, 23 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Haplogroup J-M172, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 1 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Velir

edit

I have reverted you at Velir. You will have to cite your sources properly (see WP:Citing sources) and please do not use it if it is from the Raj era (see User:Sitush/CasteSources). - Sitush (talk) 11:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

And i have just had to revert you again. This claim of Velir = Vellalar has been discussed in the past and found wanting, so unless you produce excellent sources the consensus is not likely to change. - Sitush (talk) 12:57, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

You need to be aware of this

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- Sitush (talk) 12:58, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vellalar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:51, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Poor edits

edit

This edit at Vellalar is yet another poor effort from you. Despite all of the notes above, and your fairly clear single purpose in contributing here, you still seem to be unable to grasp how Wikipedia operates. I'm not sure why you changed the information because you did not leave an edit summary; however, your changes caused the article to disagree with what the cited sources say. It needs to stop. Pinging Bishonen because it is not that long since I alerted you to the special sanctions regime that applies to topics such as this. - Sitush (talk) 09:58, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Oh, and is RajakarthipillaiVellalar (talk · contribs) another account operated by you? You've already had a block for sockpuppetry, - Sitush (talk) 10:00, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

RajakarthipillaiVellalar blocked as an obvious sock. Bishonen | tålk 10:51, 16 August 2020 (UTC).Reply

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban

edit

The following topic ban now applies to you:

You have been indefinitely topic banned from all pages and discussions related to India.

You have been sanctioned for persistent caste promotion and misuse of sources.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.

If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | tålk 10:55, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Violation of topic ban

edit

You have been blocked for 48 hours for violating the abovementioned topic ban here. Bishonen | tålk 10:17, 20 August 2020 (UTC).Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Violating topic ban

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pillai (surname).
Your topic ban from "all pages and discussions related to India," includes that article - Arjayay (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021

edit
 
To enforce an arbitration decision and for editing in violation of your topic ban on the page 1957 Ramnad riots, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

-- LuK3 (Talk) 12:50, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."