Advice edit

Even if a copy of the rest of the conversion is archived elsewhere, warnings issued to a user must be on his talk page, not on someone else's. Removing warnings from one's page is considered a form of vandalism. --Nehwyn 15:29, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Removing redlinks edit

I understand why you removed the links in Emperor Xiaojing of Eastern Wei and Emperor Wen of Western Wei, but please don't do so; the articles will be created in short order, and there is no reason to repeat the process later. This is in contrast to removing redlinks to non-notable persons; these figures are clearly important, and if somehow I don't get to them, someone will. --Nlu (talk) 15:35, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

ok. Raja Lon Flattery 15:38, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

and since you are an admin, please check this and try to solve the matter. Raja Lon Flattery 15:45, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

2 October edit

Let's make it official:

Thank you for experimenting with the page 2 October on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --CalendarWatcher 14:53, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Even if a copy of the rest of the conversion is archived elsewhere, warnings issued to a user must be on his talk page, not on someone else's. Removing warnings from one's page is considered a form of vandalism. --Nehwyn 15:29, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Do not remove official messages from your talk pages edit

You added the following random message to October 2 in this edit:

CalendarWatcher reverted this nonsense edit, one of hundreds of such edits we revert daily on those pages.

You then challenged him on it, but refused to explain your edit.

Please note that this is an official message:

Please stop. If you continue to remove legitimate warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

-- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 15:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply