November 2023 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Computer security, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 08:53, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia! However, you should know that it is not a good idea to remove citations or information sourced through citations simply because a link to a source is not working, as you did to Mahidharapura. Dead links should not be deleted. Instead, please repair or replace the link, if possible, and ensure properly sourced information is retained. Often, a live substitute link can be found. Links not used as references, notes or citations are not as important, such as those listed in the "External links" or "Further reading" sections, but bad links in those sections should also be fixed if possible. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Noted and thank you Rainbowpassion (talk) 10:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Strained yogurt edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Strained yogurt, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Jharkhand edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jharkhand, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:00, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia and copyright edit

  Hello Rainbowpassion! Your additions to Healthcare in Norway have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 16:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Noted, thanks for the inputs Rainbowpassion (talk) 06:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Kalki Bhagawan edit

Thanks for your recent edits on this page.

I have become little jaded by my experience on Wikipedia in the last few months as I haven't found many people who helped me for this (in fact often they refused. I do assume good faith and know it is for good reason :) - so truly appreciate the help.

Hence I didn't want to discourage you so didn't say anything yet - but one request - while you were editing, I actually had the "in use" template on (removed at the moment of this post). Technically at that time it is ideal if other editors don't edit the page. At the time I use it, can you please not edit so that there are no conflicts?

I do see couple of broken citations which I am not sure of how they came (could very well have been my edits also :).

From my side, I will try to keep use of this template minimal. If you use it, I will also respect it.

Thanks

Hibiscus192255 (talk) 15:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have fixed the broken citations. Hibiscus192255 (talk) 17:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Now that the in-use template post has been removed, I can continue to contribute to the article. Yes, if I see the "in-use" template again, I will refrain from any edits. Rainbowpassion (talk) 05:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply