September 2007

edit

  Thanks for experimenting with the page Section sign on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. iridescent (talk to me!) 18:00, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Suilloux

edit
 

Suilloux, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Suilloux satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suilloux and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Suilloux during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. iridescent (talk to me!) 18:01, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Section sign. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. iridescent (talk to me!) 18:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Rachelandrachel for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. iridescent (talk to me!) 19:09, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here:
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Rachelandrachel, and you are therefore blocked for period of 48 hours.
You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires.