Block evasion

edit

If you're not contesting Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sf123456 and just waiting to be blocked, you do realise that your edits will be reverted and any new article creations will be deleted, when that block hits, right? Belbury (talk) 12:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

IMdB

edit

Hi, you should be aware that WP:IMDB is generally not considered to be a WP:RELIABLE source. Thanks. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ken Todd (businessman) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ken Todd (businessman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Todd (businessman) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 01:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

July 2023

edit

  You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vanderpumpstan. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 07:12, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Vanderpumpstan per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vanderpumpstan. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 13:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply