Qvidproqvo
Corporatism#Fascism and corporatism
Hello. Your rewrite is much better. I couldn't figure out what you were talking about the first time.
In your second version is this: "Critics of the notion of the confluence of corporate power and de facto fascism included President Dwight D. Eisenhower". I am not sure what that means. Please quote from the reference you used for that:
- Ira Chernus, "Eisenhower's Ideology in World War II," Armed Forces & Society (1997) 23(4): 595-613
Is the text for that document online? --Timeshifter (talk) 06:28, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Stamp edit
My pleasure. Not a bad start, and good luck as you continue editing here. - Biruitorul Talk 00:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Links are fine, indeed encouraged. But citations should always be to external works. I recommend looking at WP:RS to have an idea what sort of material should and should not be cited. - Biruitorul Talk 00:41, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of D'Étampes de Valençay edit
A tag has been placed on D'Étampes de Valençay, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ŵïllî§ï$2? (Talk!/Sign) 02:27, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ok I'll leave as it is now. Ŵïllî§ï$2? (Talk!/Sign) 02:44, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
April 2009 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page D'Étampes de Valençay has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Fastily (talk) 02:48, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page D'Étampes de Valençay. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Fastily (talk) 02:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to D'Étampes de Valençay. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Fastily (talk) 02:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't call this edit vandalism. He was doing what I wanted him to do, which would make it acceptable on Wikipedia. The edit did not just get rid of the speedy, but fixed the article correctly. He may not have handled it properly. but he is new. Thanks! Ŵïllî§ï$2? (Talk!/Sign) 02:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits edit
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:29, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Last name stamp listed at Redirects for discussion edit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Last name stamp. Since you had some involvement with the Last name stamp redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 04:29, 19 November 2018 (UTC)