Quattro quattro uno uno

May 2024

Latest comment: 29 days ago6 comments4 people in discussion

Hello, I'm Grabup. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wikipedia:Teahouse without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GrabUp - Talk 18:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Grabup AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Quattro quattro uno uno (talk) 18:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:09, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Quattro quattro uno uno (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

SOCK PUPPETRY OF WHICH ACCOUNT? IT YOU DON'T TELL, THE BLOCK IS INVALID AND I CAN FREELY EVADE IT!!!Quattro quattro uno uno (talk) 19:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Quattro quattro uno uno (talk) 19:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic