Ptrblk

Spam in Idea (magazine)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Idea (magazine), by WWGB (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Idea (magazine) is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Idea (magazine), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Idea (magazine) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 11:10, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Advice?

Ptrblk, I have been trying very hard over the past month (or two) to make Wikipedia a more reliable source of design information. Is it worth the energy? OatmealSmith 16:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

OatmealSmith, I looked at the pages you made and was impressed by the number of design related pages created. Well done. As you can tell I am quite new to WP, so I was starting slowly. My intention was to correct the Dot Dot Dot contribution (I am one of the founding editors), and to create entries for other design journals. That's why I created Idea magazine entry, if you know the magazine, you only have to agree with the importance of inclusion of the magazine - it is the inspiration behind many other journals including Dot Dot Dot. I am sorry I didn't have many facts to include, I was going to contact the publishers to get some. So i think it is too early to delete the page.

ptrblk

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Eroica Gothenburg Opera 2010.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Eroica Gothenburg Opera 2010.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 01:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lukáš Timulak with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 18:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC)