Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, Protnet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Athens. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Ed!(talk) 03:14, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

FSM edit

The section you have added was removed from Flying Spaghetti Monster because of a lack of a reliable source linking it to the FSM. See talk page discussion. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 03:11, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:ΓΕΡΟΝΤΑΣ ΠΑΣΤΙΤΣΙΟΣ - ELDER PASTITSIOS Facebook page cover (small).jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:ΓΕΡΟΝΤΑΣ ΠΑΣΤΙΤΣΙΟΣ - ELDER PASTITSIOS Facebook page cover (small).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:25, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

June 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm TheFarix. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Vixens, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 13:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

TheFarix, If we want to be 100% "by the book", then the whole article should never have existed because it has actually no reliable sources whatsoever. (Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources: "If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it."). On the other hand Anime News Network it may be crowdsourced but so is IMDb or Wikipedia itself. Again Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources#User-generated_content doesn't say that all crowdsourced sites are unreliable but it says that they are "generally unacceptable", which means that may be acceptable in some cases. In this present case (a) the info included is just metadata, not an opinion or something so it has low possibility to be disputable and (b) is verified but another questionable source: anidb (link: anidb [dot] net/perl-bin/animedb.pl?show=anime&aid=1281 I couldn't use the full url because it's blacklisted by antispam filter). So I have put two questionable sources that say the same thing. I think that after all it's just a matter of common sense.
I haven't reverted your edit yet because I prefer to talk first and revert later, but I will evenyually do so because my common sense says that the sources are OK. Cheers. --Protnet (talk) 10:30, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
ANN's encyclopedia section has been repeatedly brought to both WP:ANIME and WP:RSN and has categorically rejected as a reliable source because it is entirely based on user generated content. Links to the discussions can be find at WP:ANIME/ORS#Situational. Also, for you information, IMDb has also been rejected for the exact same reason. You simply cannot use any user generated content to cite facts in articles. As for the notability of the subject, that is completely unrelated to your attempt to add information based on an unreliable source. —Farix (t | c) 14:06, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
I was trying to make a different point here but nevertheless I've found a by all means reliable source: Rowena Wendy Lei AKA Animetric, famous anime reviewer: http://www.animetric.com/Review/Hentai-Reviews/Vixens.html --Protnet (talk) 18:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Protnet. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Athens School of Fine Arts (emblem).jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Athens School of Fine Arts (emblem).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Protnet. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Protnet. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Vixens for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vixens, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vixens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply