September 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Android 14, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Materialscientist thanks for making me realise my mistake.i have just removed the one plus line because it was not necessary Priyansh207V (talk) 16:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Materialscientist this user looks like the same person as one of these disruptive IPs who was blocked and then caused the article to be protected once: Special:Contributions/69.157.157.227 Special:Contributions/2601:3C8:4100:3760:E9E4:A129:3B4:6BB7 Special:Contributions/2601:3C8:4100:3760:131:D3BF:FEBE:D9F4
He's doing same edits. Tehonk (talk) 22:22, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Tehonk who me? Priyansh207V (talk) 06:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Tehonk arey what is this bullshitter doing on my talk page 🤣🤣🤣 Priyansh207V (talk) 06:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Android 14, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 16:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@AgisdeSparte OK 😊 Priyansh207V (talk) 16:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Android 14, you may be blocked from editing. AgisdeSparte (talk) 16:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@AgisdeSparte are you the moderator of this page? Priyansh207V (talk) 16:46, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello @Priyansh207V; you were flagged by @Materialscientist for unexplained content deletion. I flagged you for the same thing. Before removing sentences that are sourced, I'd suggest that you go talk about it on the talk page in case your edits cause trouble. AgisdeSparte (talk) 16:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
@AgisdeSparte OK but here I explained that one plus line was unnecessary so I removed it Priyansh207V (talk) 16:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@HJ Mitchell why bro?first of all who reported I am making false edits? Priyansh207V (talk) 07:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@HJ Mitchell
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Priyansh207V (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

it was mutaza making false edits not me so pls unblock me. Priyansh207V (talk) 07:19, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You are not blocked for making "false edits", you are blocked for making disruptive edits. You will need to tell us how they were disruptive and what you will do differently for the block to be removed early. 331dot (talk) 09:30, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 14:09, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I am sorry please unblock me.

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Priyansh207V (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am sorry.I won't make disruptive edits again and will always try to make edits which are real and etical.

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

    1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
    2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
      • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
      • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
      • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
      • and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
    3. Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
    4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
    5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits have any citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
  • Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking using {{unblock}} and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 10:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Requesting Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Priyansh207V (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I know i have made an mistake by making a disruptive edit and i am regretting it.I want the administrators to give me a fair chance and unblock me and i shall promise that i wont make edits which are disruptive.Please i request the administrator who is reading this shall unblock me and i promise not to make a disruptive edit

Decline reason:

You've been shown a path to unblocking. This is not it. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 16:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Priyansh207V (talk) 09:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please be very clear. You are rejecting the path I offered you which gave you an opportunity to demonstrate a constructive edit. Is that correct? --Yamla (talk) 11:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

No I want to make an edit on the one ui page that there Is a mistake in software policy section. Priyansh207V (talk) 14:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
It is now too late to take that path. You evaded your block and lied about it. --Yamla (talk) 11:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have done the steps required for unblocking me.

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Priyansh207V (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have added content in my talk page and followed the steps required for unblocking.Please unblock me. Priyansh207V (talk) 04:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

If you are referring to the content at the top of this page, it is wholly inappropriate to add to an article in tone, style, and sourcing. You do not yet understand why you were blocked so removing the block would be a poor idea at this time. 331dot (talk) 11:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Priyansh207V (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

First of all i am soryy for whatever i have done.I won't do it again,i promise you that.Please i am sorry,please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Sorry, no. As you do not know what your mistake was, you cannot prevent repeating it.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.