Prasadmarur

You are not the authorised persons for vishvakarma.vishvakarma are superior they having their on temples and archaka.they are not taking or going Brahmin temples like Jain's,buddist and lingayutha.

Welcome!

Hello, Prasadmarur, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes. You may have problems writing in English, though. Did you know there are Wikipedias in over 300 languages? You may like to help at a Wikipedia in your language instead. Anyway, welcome to the project, and if you need help, you can visit the Teahouse. — SkiMaskA⭐ ^(💬Talk) 10:46, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Vishvakarma

Hello, I have undone your edits on the article Vishvakarma due to the following reasons:

• As per the five main policies, an article should be neutral.
• Original research should be avoided.
• Secondary sources are required.
• Keep the content in brief style.
• Your edits are not meeting General manual of style

Regards,.245CMR.•^👥📜 05:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vishvakarma have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vishvakarma was changed by Prasadmarur (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851402 on 2021-04-11T06:21:57+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:22, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Vishvakarma, you may be blocked from editing..245CMR.•^👥📜 06:42, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Please write as in vedas. Prasadmarur (talk) 06:55, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

@Prasadmarur: This is not the way how Wikipedia works. .245CMR.•^👥📜 07:00, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. .245CMR.•^👥📜 07:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Vishvakarma. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 07:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

If you are sending false information on God Vishvakarma you will be officially charged with a crime and will try to show that is guilty, in a court of law Prasadmarur (talk) 07:16, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Vishvakarma, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 07:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

If you are continuosly sending false information on God Vishvakarma you will be officially charged with a crime and will try to show that is guilty, in a court of law. Prasadmarur (talk) 07:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Vishvakarma. Serols (talk) 07:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Johnuniq (talk) 08:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

@Prasadmarur: You have been partially blocked from editing Vishvakarma to stop the disruption. First, edit warring is prohibited; instead, when edits are disputed you must discuss proposed changes on the article talk page. Second, it appears you have been adding copyrighted material from dharmakshethra.com/vishwakarma-applied-indology/. Regarding "court of law" above, please review WP:NLT. Repeating any of these problems will result in an indefinite site-wide block. Johnuniq (talk) 08:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

you are publishing on vishvakarma not as per vefic texts.. For my publish i have given vedic references.

Do not publish as God vishvakarma for particular community only..Vishvakarama is for all hindus..

Even Govt also considered he is the supreeme and celebrates vishvakarma jayanthi througout the nation. I am the proud vishvakarma.

vishvakarma people also creater,engineers..like thier God Vishvakarma.

India having the name only because of vishvakarma people because of their creativity,honest work,nonpoltical behvior.

There will not be any politics in between engineers. Vishvakarma people constructed the temples vastu shilpa with great wonders.

you people are undermining the vishvakarmas .

what you are publishing amounts be racism.

as per your arguement vishu worshiped only by vaishnavas,shiva only by shaivas..Ganapathaya only to Ganaesha

how much you makes racism and ill treat to other community that much loss to hindus gain to non hindus. whatever supreem belief of vishvakarmas you have to respect it and they have solid documental support. Prasadmarur (talk) 08:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

you will be charged with racism by sending untruth ,not as per veda,vishvakarma purana ,vishvakarma shloka,vishvakarma sukt about God vishvakarma. Prasadmarur (talk) 08:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

you are publishing untruth about hindusism..you lost all credentials by hindu followers.

you wiki is the joker .no body cares about your organisation.Those who written on vishvakarma are false and non supportive Prasadmarur (talk) 08:31, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

No one has given rights to you publish false image on vishvakarma.. Prasadmarur (talk) 08:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)