April Ivy

edit

Hello. Welcome to Wikipedia, unfortunately one or more of your recent contributions to April Ivy has been reverted. Even though I’m sure this edit was made in good-faith, it stated detailed information about a living person without citations. Wikipedia has strict policies regarding such edits, see WP:BLP. A copy of your edit is available on the article’s edit history. For more general advice on editing see the Contributing to Wikipedia page.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

AussieWikiDan (talk) 17:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2020

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

AussieWikiDan (talk) 18:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest

edit

In your latest edit to April Ivy, you included the edit summary:

The information being introduced by (talk) is incorrect. I'm part of April's management team and the alterations i'm making are true and accurate.

As a member of April Ivy's management team, you have a conflict of interest you should not be editing her biography at all. If there are factual errors in the article, please make an edit request at Talk:April Ivy, indicating what changes you would like to see (with links to verify that the changes you would like are accurate), and disclosing your relationship with the article's subject. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making promotional and non-neutral changes on April Ivy. I have informed you already that your conflict of interest precludes you from editing this article in a neutral manner, and any changes should be requested at the article's talk page. If you persist, you will likely find yourself blocked. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:05, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect Information

edit

@WikiDan61: The information that was on April's page is very incorrect, and misleading for her fans. I simply added the right facts, not opinions based on information posted on her Social media pages and interviews. If you don't allow the changes I made, false information will be available to the general public. Can you allow me to upload the correct facts? Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Portugal123fanlove (talkcontribs) 19:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

I don't see that your changes alter the factual content of the article significantly, but they do add a significant amount of promotional language and unsourced content. Again, due to your conflict of interest, you should not change the article. If there are incorrect facts, please use the article's talk page to document them and to indicate the changes you would like to see. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:34, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
I have nothing to add to WikiDan61. You have been told multiple times now to stop adding the same promotional, non-neutral POV content. In case the information given on April Ivy is incorrect, you have already been informed about the procedure in order to correct it. Clearly the correct procedure is not to add the same unsourced content again and again. Thus I reverted your recent edit. --NJD-DE (talk) 19:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is User:Portugal123fanlove at April Ivy. The discussion is about the topic Topic. Thank you. —WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Hello Portugal123fanlove. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to April Ivy, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Portugal123fanlove. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Portugal123fanlove|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2020

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (April Ivy) for Continued conflict-of-interest and promotional editing after repeatedly being informed of our policies.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 16:31, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply