October 2009

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Stockdale High School (Bakersfield, California), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stockdale High School (Bakersfield, California) was changed by Pokerface1234gaga (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-10-29T20:16:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:16, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 02:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Tommy tullips

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Tommy tullips requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  IShadowed  ✰  21:52, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello!

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia! If you need help with anything let me know by leaving me a message here or placing {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come along and help out shortly. Thanks and happy editing!  IShadowed  ✰  06:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Princess Jalapeño discography

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Princess Jalapeño discography requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 04:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrick Rodriguez discography

edit
 

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Patrick Rodriguez discography, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Salavat (talk) 16:18, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

December 2009

edit

Hi Pokerface1234gaga. Your edit to the page Leona Lewis discography was determined to be unhelpful and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Dt128 let's talk 12:28, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Patrickrodrigueztheworld.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Patrickrodrigueztheworld.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — ξxplicit 23:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Princessjalapeño.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Princessjalapeño.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 08:59, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Pucker face.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pucker face.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 08:59, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

March 22 edits reverted

edit

  This is the only warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 20:31, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 72 hours, for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

- eo (talk) 20:39, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Same vandalism edits... again

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 1 month, for vandalism, disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

- eo (talk) 23:51, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

January 2011

edit

  Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Born This Way. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply