Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Pinki Virani. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Pinki Virani, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 08:08, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Some specific issues with your edits

edit

Hello again - just to clarify some of the reasons why your edits were reverted, it was not merely because you were editing the article about yourself. The edit would have had to be reverted regardless of who made it, for reasons including (but not limited to) the following:

  • The edit introduced claims and statements that violated Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy.
  • The edit removed tags requesting that references be added to support the information in the text, without adding any sources.
  • The edit added further unsourced information - this may seem odd if you have added information about yourself, because obviously you would know these things, but Wikipedia's main principle is verifiability, and information about living people in particular must be supported by reliable independent sources.
  • The edit removed some parts of a direct quotation from a source. Quoted text within quotation marks must be reproduced exactly the way it is written in the source.

Again, please feel free to suggest changes to the article on its talk page, but please note that the policies about neutrality and verifiability have to be kept in the article. Best regards, --bonadea contributions talk 08:16, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply


Dear Pinki Virani, once again, please do not edit the article about yourself directly. You are more than welcome to point out any inaccuracies in the article on its talk page, because obviously we do not want inaccurate information in Wikipedia. I am not going to revert your entire edit this time, but it has to be heavily modified; in the interest of saving people's time it would be better if, in the future, you could use the article's talk page to discuss any changes you would like to see instead of implementing them, since other editors will always have to go through them due to your conflict of interest. Also note that text must never be copied straight from the source into a Wikipedia article, unless it is a direct quotation (within quotation marks), and such quotations should be used very sparingly. Respectfully yours, --bonadea contributions talk 08:48, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Details to Ms Bonadea [Wiki editor]

edit

Bonadea [Wiki editor] has sent me a message and am trying, unsuccessfully, to send her corrected information for my page Pinki Virani. Obviously doing something wrong but am not technically that proficient. Content is structured and ready for her to see -- updated,factually corrected, with all the citations --now how do I send it to her? Please let me know. Pinki Virani (talk) 08:58, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ms Bonadea

edit

Thank you for writing to me. This gives me the opportunity to work with you and ensure that there is accuracy and no more slanted information inserted under my name. [For example, under Passive Euthanasia where those who are anti-choice and do not wish for anyone to die with dignity, have in fact skewed the legal context and quoted selectively from other parts of the entire Supreme Court judgement. The Supreme Court Judgement-Guidelines-Law is fully downloaded in Wiki References on the page.]

I have five changes which I must send in the following format: As it appears. As it should appear. Why. [All external links are given.] All this explanation takes up close to 2,000 words [including how it appears]. How should I send it to Bonadea? Please revert.Thanks. regards. Pinki Virani (talk) 09:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Dear Pinki Virani, Thank you for this message. Your willingness to adhere to Wikipedia's policies is very much appreciated. The best way for you to suggest changes to the article is by posting them to the article's talk page, which you find at Talk:Pinki Virani (or by clicking the "Talk" tab at the top of the article Pinki Virani. It is impractical to send article changes directly to an individual editor - I am no more responsible for this article than anybody else, I just happen to have edited it a few time recently. The talk pages associated with each article is where discussion about article content belongs, and if you post there, all editors who are interested in participating in the discussion will see it. Thank you again. Respectfully yours, --bonadea contributions talk 10:13, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Attn Ms Bonadea & All Wiki Editors

edit

Thanks Ms Bonadea for your reply. Tried yesterday to upload all the points at once [am, obviously, a bit challenged in this department and it did not work :-)]. Will try and do this one correction at a time. There are 5, so it will take 5 days. Am sure Wiki will appreciate that my work is not one-dimensional -- I am not just a bestselling Author [in itself a huge achievement], as is obvious -- and Wiki will be equally interested in conveying the facts. Correction 1 with explanation for why so.


Pinki Virani (born 30 January 1959) is an Indian writer, journalist, human-rights activist and author who has won critical acclaim for her books Once Was Bombay; Aruna's Story: The True Story Of A Rape & Its Aftermath; Bitter Chocolate: Child Sexual Abuse in India (which won the National Award), Deaf Heaven[1] and Politics Of The Womb -- The Perils Of Ivf, Surrogacy & Modified Babies (which is a global-first in international book publishing)[2]. The activist-author has also been a part of two of India’s landmark laws: POCSO (protection of children from sexual abuse) and Passive Euthanasia.

Explanation for above: have given full names of the books even though she does not just write books. Proof of the Passive Euthanasia Law is already attached by Wiki on this page in the form of the Supreme Court judgement. That the author-activist has contributed towards the POCSO Act passed in 2012 is very well-known and acknowledged. Google any interview with her on the subject of child sexual abuse from 2010 to 2012 and you will see. Furthermore, the whole thing is documented in the 25th [silver] edition of the book “Bitter Chocolate” which was updated. Nevertheless, here is the latest link. Please the relevant question under proposed regulatory mechanisms and the answer.

[1]

That Politics Of The Womb is a global-first in international publishing is [a] in the catalogue of the publishers, Penguin Random House [b] on the back-cover of the book [c] on all the press releases, posters, bookmarks [d] on the facebook page of both, the publishers and the book itself [e] on Twitter everywhere, including announced by the publishers [f] within the article you have linked as #2.]

Pinki Virani (talk) 06:01, 2 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have copied this request to Talk:Pinki Virani. Please post any future requests there and not here. Thank you! --bonadea contributions talk 07:36, 2 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please see secondary source on Global-First

edit

Pinki Virani (born 30 January 1959) is an Indian writer, journalist, human-rights activist and author who has won critical acclaim for her books Once Was Bombay; Aruna's Story: The True Story Of A Rape & Its Aftermath; Bitter Chocolate: Child Sexual Abuse in India (which won the National Award), Deaf Heaven[1] and Politics Of The Womb -- The Perils Of Ivf, Surrogacy & Modified Babies (which is a global-first in international book publishing)[2]. The activist-author has also been a part of two of India’s landmark laws: POCSO (protection of children from sexual abuse) and Passive Euthanasia.

[Explanation for above: have given full names of the books even though she does not just write books. Proof of the Passive Euthanasia Law is already attached by Wiki on this page in the form of the Supreme Court judgement. That the author-activist has contributed towards the POCSO Act passed in 2012 is very well-known and acknowledged. Google any interview with her on the subject of child sexual abuse from 2010 to 2012 and you will see. Furthermore, the whole thing is documented in the 25th [silver] edition of the book “Bitter Chocolate” which was updated. Nevertheless, here is the latest link. Please the relevant question under proposed regulatory mechanisms and the answer.

[2]

That Politics Of The Womb is a global-first in international publishing is [a] in the catalogue of the publishers, Penguin Random House [b] on the back-cover of the book [c] on all the press releases, posters, bookmarks [d] on the facebook page of both, the publishers and the book itself [e] on Twitter everywhere, including announced by the publishers [f] within the article you have linked as #2.

[3]

Pinki Virani (talk) 07:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2021

edit

Olease do not edit the article Pinki Virani directly. In multiple notices above, you will find information about how to request edits to the article, and where such requests should be posted. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 15:02, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply