 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Nimbley6 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Amalthea 14:49, 28 January 2014 (UTC) |
Pedwick (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not this "Nimbly6" guy. I can't see how anyone could have came to such a conclusion given the mere 5 minuets between my edit of an article in good faith (supported by a valid explanation of why I was doing so I might add) and my being blocked. This action was an unsupported snap decision on the part of my blocker. Pedwick (talk) 15:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Two + two=four. Please don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining (as the saying goes). — Daniel Case (talk) 18:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I don't deny that 92.19.79.92 was me, but I don't see how making an edit before creating an account and then supporting my reason for it makes me a sock puppet of Nimbly. Where is the connection between me and him? Pedwick (talk) 18:28, 28 January 2014 (UTC)