Paruhangkirati

March 2024

Hello, I'm ThaddeusSholto. I noticed that you recently removed content from Tongba without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 12:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at Rai people, may be confused with vandalism. Thank you. TheTechie (formerly Mseingth2133444) (t/c) 16:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rai people, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 19:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Kinema did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. I apologize for misinterpreting your edits as vandalism, and I encourage you to use edit summaries in the future. Wracking ^talk! 00:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Gotitbro (talk) 20:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Taplejung District, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 10:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nakchhong. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Bijaypur Limbuwan

Article moved to Draft:Bijaypur Limbuwan — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bijaypur Limbuwan

The article Bijaypur Limbuwan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

May meet WP:A11, I could not find any coverage in books or online. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 16:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC)