Welcome!

edit

Hi Param Shiva! I noticed your contributions to Bell Bottom and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Originoa (talk) 06:17, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The King & the Commissioner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Embassy. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Kuruthi Aattam
added a link pointing to Kingpin
The Truth (1998 film)
added a link pointing to Indian Police

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please use edit summaries?

edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Adakiko (talk) 05:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Commando 3 (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dasara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Madhura Raja

edit

When a section needs expanding, do not reduce it, and do not create Teasers or remove WP:Spoilers "It is not acceptable to delete information from an article because you think it spoils the plot." - Arjayay (talk) 09:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Liger (film)
added a link pointing to Live
Paappan
added a link pointing to Superintendent

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vikram Vedha (2022 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Special Task Force.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yaksha: Ruthless Operations, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chinese and North Korean.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Nalina.E.Nalina per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nalina.E.Nalina. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 16:01, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Nalina. E. Nalina, this is extremely disappointing to see. First, you've ignored the concerns others have raised with your editing. Perfection is never required, but when there are issues with your editing, you've got to improve. The block of your original account was how Wikipedia admins must work to prevent further harm to the encyclopedia. You've now ignored that and created a new account, a sockpuppet. You've basically said the community is wrong, you alone are right and you will do whatever you want. If it's your website, that's totally fine, but this is on Wikipedia. That doesn't work. Read VERY CAREFULLY about block evasion and how it's dealt with. You are not editing in good faith at this point, so any and all of your edits can be reverted. Please don't continue to do this, it's not helpful for anyone. There's no question that you have a passion for editing and it's appreciated, but the lack of improvement when others raise issues is a significant problem. Ravensfire (talk) 16:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Absolutely. Nalina used to be editing in good faith, but now she threw her reputation away and became a sockpuppet master. Dinoz1 (chat?) 17:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply