Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! - CobaltBlueTony 18:33, 8 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

P.S. - Take a look at your user page!

A_Simple_Heart

edit

See User_talk:Anthony_Appleyard#A_Simple_Heart_Redirection. Anthony Appleyard 18:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)Reply


Little context in Library of Congress Classification:Class N, subclass NA - Architecture

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Library of Congress Classification:Class N, subclass NA - Architecture, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Library of Congress Classification:Class N, subclass NA - Architecture is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Library of Congress Classification:Class N, subclass NA - Architecture, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 01:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

December 2015

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:The Tale of Ralph the Collier, from its old location at User:Panzer raccoon!/new article name here. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. North America1000 05:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Draft:The Tale of Ralph the Collier concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Tale of Ralph the Collier, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Tale of Ralph the Collier has been accepted

edit
 
The Tale of Ralph the Collier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply