User talk:PRRfan/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Comment from Alphacatmarnie that belongs at Talk:Mighty Servant 2

33. "Mighty Servant / USS Robards"

Hi the article is about the Mighty Servant, the USS Robards is part of her operational history and so are many other charters, These ship transport many naval vessels of several different countries as well as just the US but, it should not be attached to the opening sentence of the article specifically when there is a whole section on the US Navy ship.

Regards

Alphacatmarnie (talk) 16:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Answering at Talk:Mighty Servant 2. PRRfan (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Park River (Connecticut), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watershed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Newkirk Monument

I saw Henry Whitely and Allan Thomson (businessman). If you put any more of these stubs up, please consider tagging them with a stub template and putting a category on them. I would also fill out the talk page templates. --evrik ^(talk) 18:13, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks; it's good advice, and as a responsible Wikipedian I should be doing more of that. And I would love nothing more than to have help adding to the small amount I've found on these people who together accomplished something momentous. But I've seen little evidence that stub tags, Talk page templates, and broad categories like "19th-century railroad executives" actually entice other editors to flesh out stubs. Have you? PRRfan (talk) 18:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

No ... Risk Engineer (talk) 15:27, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wilmington, Delaware, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eyewitness (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph C. Gilpin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Price (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

SSSS

Look, I sense an issue here. And no, I'm not an ideologue. I really do think that the references are sketchy at best. Can we do better? Can we find solid acceptable references for this sort of thing? I'm thinking of Moxie Marlinspike, who might just have the verifiable references for this. Does it go on? You and I *know* it does. But I feel that Wikipedia must have the best and most solid references, otherwise Wikipedia can not be taken seriously. I am not against this list, I feel sure that valid entries exist. But they must be "religiously" vetted to withstand the Tea Bagger Contingent who will trot out disturbing and inaccurate prattle about a Wikipedia "Left Wing bias". Taco Viva (talk) 20:50, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

My initial reaction upon seeing the deletion was "someone just wants this to be gone," but then you pointed out that all the names were poorly cited or completely uncited. Your points are all well taken. PRRfan (talk) 02:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

There is potential for a section, but it must be solid. Taco Viva (talk) 03:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Smiles

I like your User Page. Lots of useful code and links... Taco Viva (talk) 21:35, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I find it far easier to keep a "toolbox" of bits of wikicode than to remember or search for them. PRRfan (talk) 02:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Washington and Georgetown Railroad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Omnibus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Arch Street (Philadelphia)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Arch Street (Philadelphia), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://webmii.asia/Result.aspx/Arch/Street.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

The bot is comparing the Arch Street WP article to a site that took its text from the Arch Street WP article.PRRfan (talk) 00:42, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arch Street (Philadelphia)

added a link pointing to Independence Mall

William Patterson (Maryland)

added a link pointing to Charles Carroll

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pennsylvania Railroad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MARC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

R. Tait McKenzie

Of course, I'm not disputing citizenship, but there has to be a way to convey that the bulk of his career as a sculptor (30+ years out of 38 or so) was spent in Philadelphia. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 16:47, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Why not just say so? "Born in Ramsay Township, Lanark County, Ontario, Canada, he lived in several cities, including Montreal and — for a quarter-century — in Philadelphia, before finally residing at the Mill of Kintail in Almonte, Lanark County, Ontario, Canada." Or some such. I was just intrigued by "Canadian-born", which seemed to suggest that he had at some point switched citizenship, and was fascinated to find that the sculptor of "The Ideal Scout" — so widely embraced across America — remained Canadian. PRRfan (talk) 17:33, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

It makes me think of William Shatner, who was born in Canada, but whose career since the late-1950s has been in the United States. After retirement from Penn, I wonder if McKenzie resided at Almonte full time. He did die in Philadelphia. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 03:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to CSX Transportation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• much of the [[Eastern United States|eastern U.S.]], with a few routes into nearby Canadian cities.<ref name="CSX History" /
• which debuted in 2002 on No. 8503, an [[EMD SD50]] that has since been downgraded to an SD50-2).<ref>http://www.trainweb.org/csxphotos/photos/SD50/8503CSX-yn3.jpg</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:49, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CSX Transportation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tropicana. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dupont Circle

added a link pointing to World Cup

PaveGen

added a link pointing to Underground

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Direct lobbying in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Earmark. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pennsylvania Horticultural Society, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abington Township. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Halbert Powers Gillette, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forest Lawn Memorial Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Katherine M. Cohen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American Bridge Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Hart Benton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

TWL Questia check-in

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
• When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks!
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

TWL Questia check-in

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
• When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:35, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Please see

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pennsylvania#Photographing every municipality. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 17:37, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Cool; thanks. PRRfan (talk) 17:38, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francis G. Newlands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 15th Amendment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

A beer for you!

PRRfan Wishing you a joyous Christmas and a prosperous new year! BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 16:58, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Hey, thanks! And to you!

discussion at WikiProject Philadelphia

You've worked on articles about Philadelphia, so I'd like you to see a discussion at WikiProject Philadelphia: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Philadelphia#IP_editors_are_erasing_neighborhoods.

It's about a spate of recent changes, largely by anonymous users, to articles about Center City Philadelphia. The changes seem misguided to me, and I'd like to hear what other people think. TypoBoy (talk) 00:22, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Oldest railroads in North America

Hi @PRRfan: I note your reversal of my addition to Oldest railroads in North America. Okay, but unfortunately Winfield Scott Gerrish is now an orphan as a result. Given that Winfield Scott Gerrish is notable for this railway, do you have any ideas where the article could be linked from instead? Eno Lirpa (talk) 21:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Perhaps Michigan itself; this passage seems ripe: "Michigan led the nation in lumber production from the 1850s to the 1880s. Railroads became a major engine of growth from the 1850s onward, with Detroit the chief hub." PRRfan (talk) 21:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks  Done Eno Lirpa (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

There's also History of railroads in Michigan. PRRfan (talk) 13:45, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

My edit in Michigan got reverted too! But yes I have now put it into History of railroads in Michigan, Lake George, Michigan, and Muskegon River‎ so hopefully no more objections! Eno Lirpa (talk) 14:15, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Ha. Sorry about that. It's an interesting fact; I'm sure you'll find the right home for it! PRRfan (talk) 14:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 17 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Missouri–Illinois Railroad page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orleans, Massachusetts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Orléans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Luna Park, Scranton edits

Thanks for the seasonal headers but be aware that some of the info, such as the meeting with Mayor Penman is now out of chronological order. Meeting occurred in 1906 just after the park opened. Ingersoll essentially had legal permission to open the park on Sundays but backed off due to some sort of private complaints yet discovered.

In the aftermath section, US DOT did place advertisements in area papers in the early 1960's asking public if they knew what strange foundations were part of prior to burying them. Did follow-up after six months stating no one had come forward so contractor would either bury or excavate... Looking for references to be able to cite. Uncertain as to exact years and months.

Am contemplating researching complete listing of all park shows by season, all of the data necessary in Scranton Republican archives.

Thanks for the thoughtful editing. Dave S. Daves1 (talk) 14:42, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks; I'll try to be more careful about keeping things in order. Hey, one thing to consider using: the WP templates for sources: <ref name="NAME"> {{cite journal | last = | first = | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = | journal = | volume = | issue = | pages = | publisher = | location = | date = | url = | doi = | id = | accessdate = }} </ref> I use the free ProveIt tool to make generating this markup a snap. Anyway, thanks for your work in building up this article about a fascinating bit of Scranton history. PRRfan (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PRRfan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 30 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

• On the Pennsylvania Hall (Gettysburg, Pennsylvania) page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
• On the John Trautwine page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

References

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

NRHP Security Building (St. Louis, Missouri)

Hi, I noticed your creating article Security Building (St. Louis, Missouri) and added a bit to it. I got notification because it linked to Security Building disambiguation page which I guess I must have created. It's not a big deal, but i don't think the disambiguation hatnote is needed in the article. No one would arrive at this article when looking for a different one. I leave it to you to keep it or not.

I was puzzled that the architecture firm didn't have an article, but figured out it should link to Peabody and Stearns (where I see you had already edited) and then I edited there too.

By the way, perhaps you're not aware of some NRHP-related resources covered at wp:NRHPhelp, including a tool that generates an NRHP infobox for any specific NRHP site (at least if it was designated NRHP before 2012 I think is the cutoff). I used that tool to generate a slightly expanded infobox.

Thanks for your contributions, and keep up the good work! Cheers, --doncram 16:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Many thanks for filling out the article's NRHP info, and for linking to P&S, and for the pointer to the resources; I did not know about them. As for the hatnote, you may be right, but a) the DAB page was useful to me in my own research, and b) I think it's just plain interesting that so many buildings were named "Security". PRRfan (talk) 16:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Hmm, yes it is interesting about so many explicitly named "Security Building", i wonder why. The article for the Arizona one says it was built for the Security Improvement Company, but I have never heard of that. The NRHP nomination for this St. Louis one mentions a bank as its biggest first client, and later in the document includes

As the name of the building suggests, 'security' was of first importance to winning office tenants as well as attracting bank patrons. The building's heavy load-bearing brick and granite walls together with its steel frame, fireproofed with clay tile, guaranteed maximum strength and safety. The specification of brick instead of the traditional stone for a superior fireproof foundation was cited as a novel feature at the time. Brick, it was claimed, possessed a greater ability to resist cracking and crumbling when subjected to fire and cold water.

So I guess it was a marketing thing, and that people thought a place with that name would be "secure". Similar to naming of Fireproof Building in Charleston, South Carolina. Certainly it is generally believed that bank buildings should look very solid for people to have faith in them. --doncram 16:48, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Oklahoma City Blue

My argument with Yosemiter is at my talk page. Second, you disgarded my edit summary that indicated that a second edit was coming that adds back Asheville Altitude to fit with my sourced edits. I reverse his edit so as to return the sourced information I had edit and attack me for removing then unsourced and seemingly contradictory information (Asheville Altitude becoming the Tulsa 66ers). But you will find that all Yosemiter is doing now is attacking me. Spshu (talk) 14:02, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

BRD, dude. Work it out on the page's Talk page, not in an edit war. We've all been there; it won't kill you, I promise. PRRfan (talk) 14:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Excuse me, I am aware of BRD as I pointed out we are discussing (and where) the matter. You are the only edit warring here. You directly reverse my restoration of sourced information causing an edit conflict, when I added back the Asheville Altitude information. Go look. I don't disagree with him now that he has produced sources that they are the same team. So, why are you starting an edit war? Yosemiter is just outright attacking me and reverting as a part of that attack. He made it clear he is not interest in discussion. Spshu (talk) 14:38, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

One reversion = edit warring? I think not. All I'm saying, explicitly and again, is "Work it out on the Talk page." PRRfan (talk) 15:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

You declared that it was an edit war above ("not in an edit war"). Do you even know what you are saying or doing? (Your responses come across as if I say blue and you say I said red.) Stated differently for the third time, you reverted an edit in a series of two to correct the issue (the first to restore my information and the second to restore his). You have ignore me directly pointing out that a discussion exists. I am saying that it was worked out and you were disruptive of the edits needed to correct the article (which now the other editor seem to find satisfactory as I had hope). I can not be bold in crafting a resolution on my own - that is what your posts amount to be telling me. Spshu (talk) 17:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Dude, I'm bowing out of this discussion. If you've worked it out elsewhere, that's great. Sure didn't look that way in the crossfire of hostile edit summaries, nor was it in evidence on (again) the article's Talk page. All the best to you. PRRfan (talk) 17:28, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

New Rules

Hello. I don't really agree with your edits here. Some of your "tweaks" don't change much of the content; the "citation needed" template is invalid since the sentence is referenced in the commercial performance section; and you also claim that the track was certified Gold in the UK, when that's not true yet. I forgot to mention that I was reverting because of your "tweaks" as well, but it seems that you haven't removed the "citation needed" template, so I'm going to feel free to revert. Regards and have a nice day, --Paparazzzi (talk) 16:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Answered on the New Rules talk page. PRRfan (talk) 18:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IPhone X, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Facial recognition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PRRfan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)