Welcome!

Hello, OttaSotta, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Block notice

edit

Please do not abuse multiple accounts. I have disabled this account, as it is obviously a sock of User:Jonas Poole. Parsecboy (talk) 01:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

I would like to use this account again. As I said, this account is not a socketpuppet, nor have I ever intended to use it as such. Could someone please remove this ban. I've got exploration articles I'd like to eventually edit. OttaSotta (talk) 04:19, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

I would like to be UNBLOCKED now

edit
 This user is the owner of multiple Wikipedia accounts in a manner permitted by policy.

See also:

WP:SOCK#NOTIFY

No one's told me what templates exactly I need to put here, so I have no idead what I'm doing. I would like to use this account again to edit exploration articles in peace. OttaSotta (talk) 21:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please unblock account that is obviously not a sockpuppet

edit
 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
OttaSotta (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
99.67.56.209 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

I’m really tired of this. This has already been shown NOT to be a sock account. Please remove block


Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Shown where? Certainly, this account and User:Jonas Poole are editing from the same computer. What's your explanation? --jpgordon::==( o ) 04:16, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OttaSotta (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It has already been shown elsewehere (see Incidents archive Socking Jonas Poole) that I didn't intend to use this profile for "socking", so I'd like to be able to edit again, seeing as how I've done nothing wrong.

Decline reason:

It seems from the ANI discussion below and the discussion at Jonas Poole that you want to use this account (as well as Mumbles57 (talk · contribs) and RiffRaffBot (talk · contribs)) to evade accountability for your edits as Jonas Poole, in violation of the sockpuppetry policy.  Sandstein  06:08, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Comment to other reviewers - ANI discussion referred to is here).
Otta/Jonas, since you admit you're the same person, can you explain why you need this second account? —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 05:22, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply