Welcome

edit
Hello Orareol, and Welcome to Wikipedia! 

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...


Abdul raja

Orareol, good luck, and have fun. --Abdul rajaT 10:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Attitude based interview for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Attitude based interview is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attitude based interview until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:31, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

December 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attitude based interview. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:41, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Attitude based interview

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Attitude based interview, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gaijin42 (talk) 13:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

January 2012

edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you edit disruptively, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You are well aware that the article Attitude based interview was the subject of a deletion discussion, and that the outcome of that discussion was a consensus to delete the article. To attempt to unilaterally overturn consensus by simply ignoring it and recreating the article is unacceptable. If that were the whole story then I would be giving you a much milder warning, but, as you know, it is not the whole story. You had previously made an attempt to prevent discussion of the article from taking place, by blanking the discussion page. Wikipedia works by collaboration, not by individual editors trying to force their own views through and ignoring other editors' opinions. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:30, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply